Re: Conversion to generic boolean

Jan Engelhardt
2006-08-28T11:01:04Z

>> Just would like to ask if you want patches for:
>
>Total NACK to any of this boolean ididocy. I very much hope you didn't
>get the impression you actually have a chance to get this merged.
>
>> * (Most importent, may introduce bugs if left alone)
>> Fixing boolean checking, ex:
>> if (bool == FALSE)
>> to
>> if (!bool)
>
>this one of course makes sense, but please do it without introducing
>any boolean type. Getting rid of all the TRUE/FALSE defines and converting
>all scsi drivers to classic C integer as boolean semantics would be
>very welcome janitorial work.

I don't get it. You object to the 'idiocy'
(http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/7/27/281), but find the x==FALSE -> !x
a good thing?

Jan Engelhardt
--