From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove #warning cruft from drivers/scsi/ips.c Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2006 10:57:30 +1100 Message-ID: <1164153450.8090.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20061121061413.5D10967BF3@ozlabs.org> <1164122214.2808.1.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Reply-To: michael@ellerman.id.au Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-c08dA/iATCRm2c5GCl4d" Return-path: Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:8426 "EHLO ozlabs.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756889AbWKUX5b (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Nov 2006 18:57:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1164122214.2808.1.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ipslinux@adaptec.com --=-c08dA/iATCRm2c5GCl4d Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 09:16 -0600, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2006-11-21 at 17:14 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > > drivers/scsi/ips.c pollutes my build log telling me that it has only > > been tested on x86/ia64/x86_64. It's starting to get annoying. >=20 > Since we have a failure report for this driver on the ppc platform, I > don't necessarily see the warning as being inappropriate. If it's known not to work, why are we building it at all for ppc? cheers --=20 Michael Ellerman OzLabs, IBM Australia Development Lab wwweb: http://michael.ellerman.id.au phone: +61 2 6212 1183 (tie line 70 21183) We do not inherit the earth from our ancestors, we borrow it from our children. - S.M.A.R.T Person --=-c08dA/iATCRm2c5GCl4d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBFY5JpdSjSd0sB4dIRAh7TAJ444tBnCyBCwwqs0abX2e/m6soSEwCdFjqk gYFAIhBOTol9qeImI4VsviU= =KzDI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-c08dA/iATCRm2c5GCl4d--