public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Edward Goggin <egoggin@vmware.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Adam Zimman <azimman@vmware.com>,
	Petr Vandrovec <petr@vmware.com>,
	dgreen@vmware.com, Manon Goo <manon@manon.de>,
	Michael Reed <mdr@sgi.com>, "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@lsi.com>,
	David Berghoff <david@dg-i.net>, Vicky Xu <vgxu@vmware.com>,
	"Shirron, Stephen" <Stephen.Shirron@lsi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] fusion: vmware bug fix prevent inifinite retries
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:10:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1168445431.10693.3.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1168378357.8850.51.camel@egoggin-devd.eng.vmware.com>

On Tue, 2007-01-09 at 16:32 -0500, Edward Goggin wrote:
> The attached (untested) patch shows a VMware and scsi transport agnostic
> approach which introduces a new host status (DID_QUALIFIED_REQUEUE) to
> be used by mptscsih.c (and other LLDs) instead of DID_BUS_BUSY.  A host
> status of DID_QUALIFIED_REQUEUE will return ADD_TO_MLQUEUE from
> scsi_decide_disposition IFF the REQ_FAILFAST bit is not set in the
> cmd_flags field of the SCSI command's request structure.
> 
> The approach depends on both VMware Linux guests not setting
> REQ_FAILFAST and non-VMware Linux hosts with an IBM RDAC/MPP multi-
> pathing driver doing so.  This requirement is not a problem for VMware
> since its guest operating systems have no need to configure block device
> multi-pathing.  This requirement shouldn't be a problem for the IBM
> RDAC/MPP driver either since it should already be setting the
> REQ_FAILFAST attribute of I/Os for which it is providing multi-pathing,
> similar to what the Linux dm-multipath driver already does.

Not in the driver, please ...

the SAM status BUSY is a well known one for array controllers to return
while contemplating a failover.  Thus, if we think this is the issue,
the mid-layer should be the entity to pass the status through on
REQ_FAILFAST not the driver (i.e. pass SAM_STAT_BUSY through unmodified
and alter the mid-layer).  However, I'd be unhappy about doing this:
BUSY is a standard return for a lot of controllers for transient
resource conditions, which wouldn't necessarily be alleviated on path
failover.

James



  reply	other threads:[~2007-01-10 16:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-01-09 18:14 [PATCH 2/5] fusion: vmware bug fix prevent inifinite retries Adam Zimman
2007-01-09 20:55 ` Petr Vandrovec
2007-01-09 21:32   ` Edward Goggin
2007-01-10 16:10     ` James Bottomley [this message]
2007-01-10 16:44       ` Edward Goggin
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-01-10  5:44 Moore, Eric
2007-01-09  1:37 Moore, Eric
2007-01-09 16:17 ` Michael Reed
2007-01-09 17:49   ` Manon Goo
2007-01-08 22:03 Moore, Eric
2007-01-08 22:24 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-05  3:46 Eric Moore
2007-01-06 15:30 ` James Bottomley
2007-01-06 16:10   ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-01-06 16:28     ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1168445431.10693.3.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
    --cc=Eric.Moore@lsi.com \
    --cc=Stephen.Shirron@lsi.com \
    --cc=azimman@vmware.com \
    --cc=david@dg-i.net \
    --cc=dgreen@vmware.com \
    --cc=egoggin@vmware.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manon@manon.de \
    --cc=mdr@sgi.com \
    --cc=petr@vmware.com \
    --cc=vgxu@vmware.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox