From: Edward Goggin <egoggin@vmware.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: why no cmd_flags parameter for scsi_execute_async?
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2007 17:19:04 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1169763544.6129.47.camel@egoggin-devd.eng.vmware.com> (raw)
Looks like a simple oversight, but does anyone know why there a
cmd_flags parameter for scsi_execute but not for scsi_execute_async?
Seems like this is lost functionality when scsi_execute_async replaced
scsi_do_req. Previously, the caller of scsi_do_req could set the flags
field of the sr_request structure of the scsi_request parameter to the
function.
Is scsi_execute_async being replaced as part of the bidi patch set?
I'd like to submit a patch to fix this but I want to make sure its
worthwhile.
next reply other threads:[~2007-01-25 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-25 22:19 Edward Goggin [this message]
2007-01-25 21:34 ` why no cmd_flags parameter for scsi_execute_async? Mike Christie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1169763544.6129.47.camel@egoggin-devd.eng.vmware.com \
--to=egoggin@vmware.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox