public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Edward Goggin <egoggin@vmware.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, eric.moore@lsi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] : definion, code, and use of new SCSI ML host status DID_COND_REQUEUE
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:33:38 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1170459219.14264.91.camel@egoggin-devd.eng.vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170458287.3380.39.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>

On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 17:18 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 18:11 -0500, Edward Goggin wrote:
> > That solution doesn't work for the RDAC/MPP driver as the BUSY status
> > handler retries indefinitely.  We need a solution which works for both a
> > bare metal host running RDAC/MPP which for this use case, wants to get
> > control over the failed command ASAP and a VMware host which may need to
> > retry longer than DID_BUS_BUSY currently allows for.
> 
> No it doesn't, not any longer... the mid-layer retries for the command
> up to its timeout before failing.  That's the point about questioning
> the validity of the original problem.
> 
> James
> 
> 

I think I see your argument ... retries for BUSY and all other scsi/host
status's are limited by the code in scsi_softirq_done which filters the
disposition returned by scsi_decide_disposition, so no status will yield
an indefinite retry.

Not clear if that's soon enough for RDAC/MPP.  For the VMware case, it
appears to allow an additional 30 seconds (beyond what DID_BUSY_BUSY
would allow) for a retry. 


      reply	other threads:[~2007-02-02 23:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-02-02 22:04 [PATCH 0/2] : definion, code, and use of new SCSI ML host status DID_COND_REQUEUE Edward Goggin
2007-02-02 22:54 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-02 23:11   ` Edward Goggin
2007-02-02 23:18     ` James Bottomley
2007-02-02 23:33       ` Edward Goggin [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1170459219.14264.91.camel@egoggin-devd.eng.vmware.com \
    --to=egoggin@vmware.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=eric.moore@lsi.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox