From: Edward Goggin <egoggin@vmware.com>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, eric.moore@lsi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] : definion, code, and use of new SCSI ML host status DID_COND_REQUEUE
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:33:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1170459219.14264.91.camel@egoggin-devd.eng.vmware.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1170458287.3380.39.camel@mulgrave.il.steeleye.com>
On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 17:18 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 18:11 -0500, Edward Goggin wrote:
> > That solution doesn't work for the RDAC/MPP driver as the BUSY status
> > handler retries indefinitely. We need a solution which works for both a
> > bare metal host running RDAC/MPP which for this use case, wants to get
> > control over the failed command ASAP and a VMware host which may need to
> > retry longer than DID_BUS_BUSY currently allows for.
>
> No it doesn't, not any longer... the mid-layer retries for the command
> up to its timeout before failing. That's the point about questioning
> the validity of the original problem.
>
> James
>
>
I think I see your argument ... retries for BUSY and all other scsi/host
status's are limited by the code in scsi_softirq_done which filters the
disposition returned by scsi_decide_disposition, so no status will yield
an indefinite retry.
Not clear if that's soon enough for RDAC/MPP. For the VMware case, it
appears to allow an additional 30 seconds (beyond what DID_BUSY_BUSY
would allow) for a retry.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-02 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-02 22:04 [PATCH 0/2] : definion, code, and use of new SCSI ML host status DID_COND_REQUEUE Edward Goggin
2007-02-02 22:54 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-02 23:11 ` Edward Goggin
2007-02-02 23:18 ` James Bottomley
2007-02-02 23:33 ` Edward Goggin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1170459219.14264.91.camel@egoggin-devd.eng.vmware.com \
--to=egoggin@vmware.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
--cc=eric.moore@lsi.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox