Re: [PATCH] FC Transport support for vports based on NPIV

Christof Schmitt
2007-05-22T10:40:10Z

On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:45:13AM -0400, James Smart wrote:

> True - so this means that who-ever is setting the subchannel device
> permanent_port_name value needs to take into account this conversation,
> when T11.3 actually makes a choice on what it should be.

I will keep this in mind. Probably this would involve the FCP adapter
and the reporting in zfcp.

Anyway, my main goal was to understand the changes in the FC transport
class and the possible impact to zfcp. Thanks for the clarification
of my questions.

Christof