From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] microtek: convert to use the data buffer accessors
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 10:26:35 -0500
Message-ID: <1186932395.3400.4.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <20070811072657A.tomof@acm.org>
	 <E472128B1EB43941B4E7FB268020C89B0250BA18@riverside.int.panasas.com>
	 <20070811153044Z.tomof@acm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from hancock.steeleye.com ([71.30.118.248]:38864 "EHLO
	hancock.sc.steeleye.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S935359AbXHLP0h (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>); Sun, 12 Aug 2007 11:26:37 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20070811153044Z.tomof@acm.org>
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: FUJITA Tomonori <tomof@acm.org>
Cc: bharrosh@panasas.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, greg@kroah.com, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp

On Mon, 2007-08-13 at 00:12 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> Oops, I didn't realized that. Isn't the patch in scsi-misc,
> scsi-pending, or scsi-fixes?

No ... I forgot ... after Greg told me to take it through my tree ...
I'll add it.

James