From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [patchset 0/24] Lots of the Accessors patches and !use_sg cleanup Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2007 16:00:29 -0500 Message-ID: <1190062829.3386.49.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <46E6F92D.2090409@panasas.com> <200709171246.15142.bzolnier@gmail.com> <1190037090.3386.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <200709172205.36070.bzolnier@gmail.com> <46EEEA40.40908@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hancock.steeleye.com ([71.30.118.248]:50539 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754856AbXIQVAe (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Sep 2007 17:00:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <46EEEA40.40908@garzik.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , Boaz Harrosh , FUJITA Tomonori , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Alan Stern , Matthew Dharm , Russell King , "David S. Miller" , YOKOTA Hiroshi , linux-scsi , "Maciej W. Rozycki" , Mark Fortescue , osst@riede.org On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 16:57 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > On Monday 17 September 2007, James Bottomley wrote: > >> Realistically (and I hate myself for saying this) libata-pata does > >> provide a much better alternative for the ATAPI devices. Is it just > >> time to recognise the inevitable and kill ide-scsi? > > > > Agreed, libata-pata is a much better version of ide-scsi. ;-) > > > > If there is general consensus about ide-scsi removal I think that we > > should start with disabling ide-scsi Kconfig entry in 2.6.24 to later > > remove the ide-scsi driver completely in 2.6.25. > > > Perhaps it is strange to hear me say this, but... > > My experience with the IDE driver in the field is that ide-scsi sees a > fair amount of use, as an intentional replacement for ide-cd and the > other hand-written ide-$class ATAPI drivers. > > I would prefer that ide-scsi stays around as long as ide stays around. Of course ... as long as we get to address you as Mr Maintainer ... James