From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
To: Stefan Boresch <stefan@mdy.univie.ac.at>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_transport_spi: fix domain validation failure from incorrect width setting
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:50:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1190641834.3355.2.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070924121004.GR1606@loop.mdy.univie.ac.at>
On Mon, 2007-09-24 at 14:10 +0200, Stefan Boresch wrote:
> Dear James!
>
> Sorry for replying so late!
>
> On Sat, Sep 22, 2007 at 08:40:09AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > The previous patch was a bit non-standard because it actually adjusted
> > the user setting max_width. This would mean that if the user replaced
> > the cable and then re-ran domain validation, it still wouldn't try wide
> > transfers, which is wrong.
> >
> > The attached patch fixes the problem by physically nailing the wide
> > setting to what it deduces it should be for the whole of Domain
> > Validation.
> >
> > James
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
> [snip]
>
> A self-compiled kernel based on the Ubuntu "gutsy" kernel sources
> (linux-source-2.6.22_2.6.22-12.36_all.deb, for whatever that is worth) boots
> successfully, after applying your patch (which applied cleanly)
>
> Thanks so much for your help,
You're very welcome.
> Stefan Boresch
>
> PS: BTW, your original post (diagnosis of hardware issues) has also
> convinced my vendor to do some work to honor his warranty. So, my next
> job is to dig into the big box which just arrived by fed-ex containing
> all possible replacements (including a new motherboard ..). Maybe,
> I'll eventually get U320 running on this machine ;-)
OK ... I'd replace the cable first ... and check for bent pins in the
connector. What Domain Validation is saying is that there's something
wrong with the upper 8 bits of the wide bus. Those are the last few
wires on the 68 wire ribbon cable (wire one is usually marked in a
different colour).
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-24 13:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-22 13:40 [PATCH] scsi_transport_spi: fix domain validation failure from incorrect width setting James Bottomley
2007-09-24 12:10 ` Stefan Boresch
2007-09-24 13:50 ` James Bottomley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1190641834.3355.2.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@steeleye.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefan@mdy.univie.ac.at \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox