From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: queued patches for SCSI for 2.6.24 Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:42:35 -0500 Message-ID: <1190770955.8707.23.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1190768402.8707.20.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070925065233Q.tomof@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hancock.steeleye.com ([71.30.118.248]:58414 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752210AbXIZBmi (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:42:38 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070925065233Q.tomof@acm.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 10:28 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > On Tue, 25 Sep 2007 20:00:02 -0500 > James Bottomley wrote: > > > Andrew asked that I provide a status report of pending updates. The > > list is attached below. It's pretty much driver updates and minor bug > > fixes. The main functionality changes are Kay's sysfs updates and the > > shift of the ULD attachement towards the block prep function. > > Can we make new 'supporrted_mode' and 'active_mode' attributes look > better? > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=118991196128245&w=2 Sure, but Jeff's suggestion was a good one to avoid me having to change hundreds of files. Could you roll it up and resubmit? James