From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] fix iommu sg list merge problem Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 09:38:32 -0500 Message-ID: <1190817512.3359.16.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070925142141N.tomof@acm.org> <20070926100221.GW4239@rhun.haifa.ibm.com> <20070925200025O.tomof@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hancock.steeleye.com ([71.30.118.248]:60107 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753491AbXIZOie (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:38:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070925200025O.tomof@acm.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: muli@il.ibm.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org, jeff@garzik.org, gregkh@suse.de, hare@suse.de, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 23:34 +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > Yeah, I thought about it and it's possible (but not so easy). parisc > has IOMMU merging helper code and two parisc IOMMUs use it. ia64 > sba_iommu is almost identical to parisc code. x86_64 gart, power, and > alpha do in their own way. But I think that we can merging helper code > useful for all. Er ... it should be identical ... the SBA iommu is the same ... I thought we moved the common code out to a shared file. James