From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] aic94xx: fix SSP IU status print-out Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2007 12:26:27 -0500 Message-ID: <1191345987.3530.104.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20070930140317.GA7134@havoc.gtf.org> <4702399A.9010708@garzik.org> <1191334857.3530.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47025743.3070100@garzik.org> <1191336373.3530.62.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47025A4E.6040200@garzik.org> <1191337213.3530.71.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47027BBC.5040708@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from hancock.steeleye.com ([71.30.118.248]:60567 "EHLO hancock.sc.steeleye.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753029AbXJBR0c (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Oct 2007 13:26:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <47027BBC.5040708@garzik.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 13:11 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > > So I know, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that there are no non-x86 users > > of this. > > If you don't get the DMA direction right on x86, swiotlb will corrupt > your data. Er, this is a fully 64 bit device: it shouldn't use swiotlb. James