public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	SCSI development list <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: BUG in: Driver core: convert block from raw kobjects to core devices (fwd)
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 17:42:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1193848942.6621.18.camel@lov.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1193848270.3411.39.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:31 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 17:24 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 11:13 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2007-10-31 at 12:04 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > > Yes, the queue is a child of the disk.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Right, so this goes gendisk->queue (-> meaning parent of, or takes
> > > > > reference to)
> > > > 
> > > > No, no!  The _child_ takes an implicit reference to the _parent_, not 
> > > > the other way around.
> > > > 
> > > > > > > The scsi_device has a ref to the queue
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yeah, while the queue is a grandchild of the scsi_device with the
> > > > > > unified sysfs layout.
> > > > > 
> > > > > No, the scsi_device is a direct parent of the queue, so we have
> > > > > 
> > > > > scsi_device->queue
> > > > 
> > > > Wrong -- the gendisk is the direct parent of the queue.  The relevant 
> > > > line is in ll_rw_blk.c:blk_register_queue():
> > > > 
> > > > 	q->kobj.parent = kobject_get(&disk->dev.kobj);
> > > > 
> > > > > > Yes, sounds right. We need to break that deleted-but-wait-for-cleanup at
> > > > > > least at one of the devices involved.
> > > > > 
> > > > > But it's broken when the driver is unbound.  Diagrammatically it's:
> > > > > 
> > > > > scsi_disk -> scsi_device -> queue
> > > > >           -> gendisk     ->
> > > > > 
> > > > > It's not circular, it's released when scsi_disk is released.  It can
> > > > > become circular if there's some hidden dependency between any of the
> > > > > components ... but I don't think there is.
> > > > 
> > > > Forget about the scsi_disk.  It isn't part of the problem.  Just 
> > > > concentrate on the scsi_device, the gendisk, and the queue.  We have:
> > > > 
> > > > 	scsi_device <- gendisk <- queue <- scsi_device,
> > > 
> > > OK, so where does the gendisk get a reference to the scsi device?
> > 
> > In the unified sysfs layout where the silly and conceptual broken idea
> > of "class devices" gets removed.
> > Everything that has a "device" link today will just live below the
> > device the "device" link points to. The whole current kernel is already
> > converted to do this, besides the "raw kobject" gendisk's, and the SCSI
> > subsystem. The gendisk patch is queued in Greg's tree (see subject of
> > this mail), and the conversion from "struct class_device" to "struct
> > device" for the whole SCSI directory is coming soon.
> > 
> > With the gendisk pointing to "driverfs_dev" ("device" link) it will
> > become a child of the scsi_device.
> 
> OK, light beginning to go on now.
> 
> The problem is that you've fallen into the conceptual trap we tried very
> hard to avoid in the initial go around of joining SCSI upper layer
> drivers to gendisks.  That's why no gendisk references are held by the
> mid-layer, only by the entities that represent the objects created by
> upper layer drivers.

That will not change, only the disk will reference the device which it
points to. It's not a problem, we can "orphan" the disk on delete, or we
do the "orphaning" for all devices in the core, which is probably the
right fix anyway.

> Doesn't this circularity now exist for everything?  Every device that
> creates a queue has a reference to the queue, every queue has a
> reference to its attached gendisk and now every gendisk has a reference
> to the device creating the queue?  This doesn't look to be a SCSI
> specific problem.

It's only SCSI so far, everything else seems fine.

But, the real problem is that the core seems to deadlock if two devices
reference each other (or build a larger circle), even when they are
deleted, that's the problem we are running in.

Thanks,
Kay


  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-31 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-29 15:18 BUG in: Driver core: convert block from raw kobjects to core devices (fwd) Alan Stern
2007-10-29 15:35 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-29 16:38   ` Alan Stern
2007-10-29 16:45     ` James Bottomley
2007-10-29 17:04       ` Alan Stern
2007-10-29 18:47   ` Alan Stern
2007-10-29 19:13     ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-31  4:25       ` Greg KH
2007-10-31 10:46         ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-31 14:32           ` Greg KH
2007-10-31 15:15             ` James Bottomley
2007-10-31 15:40               ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-31 15:47                 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-31 16:04                   ` Alan Stern
2007-10-31 16:13                     ` James Bottomley
2007-10-31 16:24                       ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-31 16:31                         ` James Bottomley
2007-10-31 16:42                           ` Kay Sievers [this message]
2007-10-31 16:46                             ` James Bottomley
2007-10-31 17:32                               ` Kay Sievers
2007-10-31 18:36                               ` Alan Stern
2007-10-31 16:44                           ` Alan Stern
2007-10-31 17:07                             ` James Bottomley
2007-10-31 18:38                               ` Alan Stern
2007-10-31 15:58               ` Alan Stern
2007-10-31 16:11                 ` James Bottomley
2007-10-31  4:24     ` Greg KH
2007-10-31 15:51       ` Alan Stern

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1193848942.6621.18.camel@lov.site \
    --to=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox