From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] tgt: Use scsi_init_io instead of scsi_alloc_sgtable Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2008 17:02:34 -0600 Message-ID: <1199487754.17877.99.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <47611977.5080702@panasas.com> <47611B01.4010505@panasas.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:50018 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753928AbYADXCl (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Jan 2008 18:02:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47611B01.4010505@panasas.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Boaz Harrosh Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , linux-scsi , Andrew Morton On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 13:44 +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > - If we export scsi_init_io()/scsi_release_buffers() instead of > scsi_{alloc,free}_sgtable() from scsi_lib than tgt code is > much more insulated from scsi_lib changes. As a bonus it will > also gain bidi capability when it comes. > > Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh > Acked-by: FUJITA Tomonori I'm afraid the reversion of ->done removal broke the application of this yet again ... could you respin. Thanks, James