From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: "Peter Wang (王信友)" <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"martin.petersen@oracle.com" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: wsd_upstream <wsd_upstream@mediatek.com>,
"linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 2/2] ufs: core: requeue aborted request
Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 11:06:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <11c15e60-4d4c-46c3-b3e0-e1c4497378a2@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb9280de1a6dde857f0f3fe8c784bd71653a5ec4.camel@mediatek.com>
On 10/8/24 7:17 PM, Peter Wang (王信友) wrote:
> Yes, this patch is only for MCQ mode, because only MCQ mode
> receives OCS: ABORTED, right? This patch doesn't modify
> any of the Legacy mode flows, does it?
Agreed. What I mentioned in my email is an existing bug in the legacy
flow for ufshcd_abort_all().
> Furthermore, even if there is an issue with Legacy mode, it
> should be addressed by a separate patch, not by this one, which is
> intended to resolve the MCQ mode issue. We shouldn't mix two
> different issues together, don't you agree?
Let's proceed with this patch series and let's address what I brought
up in my email separately.
With the current approach for error handling in the UFS driver, anyone
who wants to verify or modify ufshcd_try_to_abort_task() has to consider
all possible interleavings of ufshcd_try_to_abort_task() and the
completion path (ufshcd_compl_one_cqe()). That's an unnecessary burden
on UFS driver contributors. Additionally, this is error-prone. This
applies to both modes (legacy and MCQ). I know of reports of sporadic
crashes in legacy mode related to UFS error handling. I'm wondering
whether these are perhaps the result of the issue I mentioned in a
previous email. Anyway, I will look further into this myself as soon as
I have the time.
Thanks,
Bart.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-01 9:19 [PATCH v10 0/2] fix abort defect peter.wang
2024-10-01 9:19 ` [PATCH v10 1/2] ufs: core: fix the issue of ICU failure peter.wang
2024-10-01 9:19 ` [PATCH v10 2/2] ufs: core: requeue aborted request peter.wang
2024-10-01 17:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-10-02 12:42 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-10-03 20:02 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-10-07 7:20 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-10-08 18:29 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-10-09 2:17 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-10-09 18:06 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2024-10-11 5:44 ` Peter Wang (王信友)
2024-10-09 17:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-10-16 2:38 ` [PATCH v10 0/2] fix abort defect Martin K. Petersen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=11c15e60-4d4c-46c3-b3e0-e1c4497378a2@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
--cc=wsd_upstream@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox