From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] aacraid: add call to flush_kernel_dcache_page for architectures that require it (take 2) Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:56:53 -0600 Message-ID: <1200081413.3286.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20071031150216.88cecc21.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20071101173221.2e1fea42.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <532ABFBDAAC3A34EB12EBA6CEC2838F40FE734@ADPE2K703.adaptec.com> <532ABFBDAAC3A34EB12EBA6CEC2838F40DC622@ADPE2K703.adaptec.com> <1200069662.3286.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <532ABFBDAAC3A34EB12EBA6CEC2838F437E443B7@ADPE2K703.adaptec.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:55545 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761638AbYAKT46 (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:56:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <532ABFBDAAC3A34EB12EBA6CEC2838F437E443B7@ADPE2K703.adaptec.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Salyzyn, Mark" Cc: "'linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org'" On Fri, 2008-01-11 at 11:46 -0800, Salyzyn, Mark wrote: > The reason for the guard was for Linux Distributions that had limited > their list of exported APIs on architectures that did *not* require > the flush_kernel_dcache_page ... Sorry for not filtering out > Distribution kernel issues into the list! :-) That's OK, but you might want to update your distro patch. The correct guard check is ARCH_HAS_FLUSH_KERNEL_DCACHE_PAGE for them ... > Dropped guard in the enclosed patch. Thanks! James