From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
Aegis Lin <aegislin@gmail.com>,
Masakazu Mokuno <Masakazu_Mokuno@hq.scei.sony.co.jp>,
Cell Broadband Engine OSS Development <cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] ps3rom: sector size should be 512 bytes
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:34:07 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1201793647.3131.8.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201788625.11265.23.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 06:10 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> Greetings Geert and Co,
>
> I have a related patch that I have been using with ps3rom.c for some
> time that fixes a bug in fs/bio.c that assumes 512 byte sectors for
> ATAPI operations. This bug actually exists for all non 512 byte sector
> devices go through this code path (I found it with
> scsi_execute_async()), but I first ran into this issue with ps3rom.c
> because max_sectors (32) is small enough to trigger the bug assuming 512
> byte sectors during typical ATAPI READ_10 ops with iSCSI/HD. Because
> typical max_sector settings for libata and USB are much higher, I have
> never ran into this issue outside of ps3rom.c, but the bug exists
> nevertheless..
>
> The current patch assumes 512 byte sectors, and adds a sector_size
> parameter to drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:scsi_req_map_sg() to change it for
> passed struct request. I know that some folks talked about killing
> scsi_execute_async() and fixing this problem elsewhere, but until then
> please consider this patch. Any input is also appreciated.
My first reaction is really, no; there's no way we should be doing such
a nasty layering violation.
The block code is set up to work with 512 byte sectors for its internal
counts. Something like this will damage all non-512 byte sector devices
(and we do have several of those).
There are three quantities you need to understand when trying to do
something like this
1. The actual internal block sector size for sector counts. This
is hard coded to 512
2. The medium sector size. This is stored in hardsect_size in the
queue. Block ensures that it always sends down enough 512 byte
sectors to be a multiple of this
3. The block size. This represents the unit the user of the device
wants to think in terms of (most often for filesystems, the fs
block size). It's stored in various places including the
block_device bd_block_size.
It really sounds like the problem with ps3rom is that hardsect_size
isn't being set correctly. As I understand the problem, from the
incredibly cursory insight the emails give, so please correct if wrong,
you want the hard sector size to be the CD_FRAMESIZE?
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 15:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <dc3abf350801290318u66474599n2f293832373f3706@mail.gmail.com>
2008-01-31 13:28 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] ps3rom: sector size should be 512 bytes Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-01-31 14:10 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-01-31 15:34 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-01-31 16:10 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-01-31 16:26 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-31 17:28 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-01-31 17:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-01-31 18:06 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-31 18:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-01-31 17:53 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-31 18:44 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-01-31 19:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-01 5:01 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-01-31 19:42 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-01 1:58 ` Update SCSI documentation for 512 byte sector requirement with max_sectors Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-02-01 2:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-01 4:38 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1201793647.3131.8.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=Masakazu_Mokuno@hq.scei.sony.co.jp \
--cc=aegislin@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox