From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>,
Aegis Lin <aegislin@gmail.com>,
Masakazu Mokuno <Masakazu_Mokuno@hq.scei.sony.co.jp>,
Cell Broadband Engine OSS Development <cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] ps3rom: sector size should be 512 bytes
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2008 09:28:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1201800489.11265.134.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1201796764.3131.15.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 10:26 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 08:10 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 09:34 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 06:10 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > > Greetings Geert and Co,
> > > >
> > > > I have a related patch that I have been using with ps3rom.c for some
> > > > time that fixes a bug in fs/bio.c that assumes 512 byte sectors for
> > > > ATAPI operations. This bug actually exists for all non 512 byte sector
> > > > devices go through this code path (I found it with
> > > > scsi_execute_async()), but I first ran into this issue with ps3rom.c
> > > > because max_sectors (32) is small enough to trigger the bug assuming 512
> > > > byte sectors during typical ATAPI READ_10 ops with iSCSI/HD. Because
> > > > typical max_sector settings for libata and USB are much higher, I have
> > > > never ran into this issue outside of ps3rom.c, but the bug exists
> > > > nevertheless..
> > > >
> > > > The current patch assumes 512 byte sectors, and adds a sector_size
> > > > parameter to drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c:scsi_req_map_sg() to change it for
> > > > passed struct request. I know that some folks talked about killing
> > > > scsi_execute_async() and fixing this problem elsewhere, but until then
> > > > please consider this patch. Any input is also appreciated.
> > >
> > > My first reaction is really, no; there's no way we should be doing such
> > > a nasty layering violation.
> > >
> >
> > I don't care for it either, but without this patch (or something
> > similar) all SCSI targets that use scsi_execute_async(), for non 512
> > byte requests are broken. This causes a problem when a small max_sector
> > is correctly used by the LLD, and trips the check in
> > fs/bio.c:__bio_add_page()
> >
> > if (((bio->bi_size + len) >> 9) > max_sectors)
> >
>
> Could we rewind this discussion back to an actual problem description
> then, please? Nothing in the standard path for a CD/DVD should be using
> scsi_execute_async(), what's the actual problem use case?
>
The problem case is a SCSI Target Mode engine that receives a 2048 Byte
single sector ATAPI READ_10 request from the storage fabric, and uses
scsi_execute_async() (the only option >= 2.6.18) to issue said request
to the underlying struct scsi_device. Because the underlying bio code
assumes 512 byte only sectors, the check in __bio_add_page() incorrectly
determines that max_sectors (max_sectors has to be low, as with 32 from
ps3rom.c) has been exceeded, and fails the request back up the stack.
--nab
> James
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-01-31 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <dc3abf350801290318u66474599n2f293832373f3706@mail.gmail.com>
2008-01-31 13:28 ` [Cbe-oss-dev] [PATCH] ps3rom: sector size should be 512 bytes Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-01-31 14:10 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-01-31 15:34 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-31 16:10 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-01-31 16:26 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-31 17:28 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2008-01-31 17:41 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-01-31 18:06 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-31 18:48 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-01-31 17:53 ` James Bottomley
2008-01-31 18:44 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-01-31 19:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-02-01 5:01 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-01-31 19:42 ` James Bottomley
2008-02-01 1:58 ` Update SCSI documentation for 512 byte sector requirement with max_sectors Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-02-01 2:46 ` Randy Dunlap
2008-02-01 4:38 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1201800489.11265.134.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=Masakazu_Mokuno@hq.scei.sony.co.jp \
--cc=aegislin@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cbe-oss-dev@ozlabs.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox