From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND number 2] libata: eliminate the home grown dma padding in favour of that provided by the block layer Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 15:09:35 -0600 Message-ID: <1201900175.3134.67.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1199138168.3110.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1200698057.3111.68.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1201894847.3134.59.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47A37AF3.3030503@garzik.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:57893 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750864AbYBAVJh (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Feb 2008 16:09:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47A37AF3.3030503@garzik.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff Garzik Cc: linux-scsi , linux-ide , Jens Axboe , FUJITA Tomonori , Tejun Heo On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 15:02 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > James Bottomley wrote: > > Could we please get this in ... I thought I mentioned several times that > > it fixes a fatal oops in both aic94xx and ipr. > > Tejun has a persistent objection... see other email. Actually, see other email .. I meant that this patch (eliminate dma padding) is independent of the drain one. James