From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 09:30:15 -0600 Message-ID: <1202139015.3096.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1201639331.3069.58.camel@localhost.localdomain> <47A05CBD.5050803@vlnb.net> <47A7049A.9000105@vlnb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:37468 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753673AbYBDPaV (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:30:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: <47A7049A.9000105@vlnb.net> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin Cc: Bart Van Assche , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , FUJITA Tomonori , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 15:27 +0300, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote: > So, James, what is your opinion on the above? Or the overall SCSI target > project simplicity doesn't matter much for you and you think it's fine > to duplicate Linux page cache in the user space to keep the in-kernel > part of the project as small as possible? The answers were pretty much contained here http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=120164008302435 and here: http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=120171067107293 Weren't they? James