From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_error: Fix language abuse. Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2008 10:28:02 -0600 Message-ID: <1202488082.3102.28.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080208153217.5fc42a50@core> <1202486247.3102.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20080208155938.339d9f3d@core> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:37631 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759369AbYBHQ2G (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Feb 2008 11:28:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20080208155938.339d9f3d@core> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Cox Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 15:59 +0000, Alan Cox wrote: > > http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/drafts/spc3/spc3r23.pdf > > > > By a simple text search. > > > > I don't think the pedantry is worth the confusion ... > > Ok so we should file a formal change request with T10 instead perhaps ? As long as that "we" is royal, be my guest and go ahead. If you set up the correct legal trust, your heirs and assigns can submit the patch just as soon as T10 accepts the change ... James