public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] scsi fixes for 2.6.25-rc2
Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:56:12 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1203800172.3139.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.1.00.0802231229320.21332@woody.linux-foundation.org>


On Sat, 2008-02-23 at 12:31 -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > 
> > I know I am probably shooting myself in the foot here, since I am the original
> > author of mvsas, but...
> > 
> > Should we be adding new drivers during -rc?
> 
> I'm personally of the opinion that a new driver that doesn't add anything 
> but itself (ie no infrastructure changes etc) is fine. I'd rather have a 
> new, rough driver that might work, than no driver at all, and it's not 
> like it can cause a regression if you don't enable it.

That is the case for this one.  The two patches only touch the mvsas.c
file (and Makefile and Kconfig to build it, of course).

James



  parent reply	other threads:[~2008-02-23 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-02-23 15:13 [GIT PATCH] scsi fixes for 2.6.25-rc2 James Bottomley
2008-02-23 20:25 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-23 20:27   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-23 20:31   ` Linus Torvalds
2008-02-23 20:44     ` Andrew Morton
2008-02-23 23:53       ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-23 20:56     ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-02-23 23:01 ` Olof Johansson
2008-02-23 23:31   ` Jeff Garzik
2008-02-24  0:09     ` James Bottomley

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1203800172.3139.7.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jeff@garzik.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox