From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Ke Wei <kewei.mv@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mvsas: fix default can_queue
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:42:25 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1204504945.3069.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1204308113.4003.45.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Fri, 2008-02-29 at 12:01 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> I noticed that the current marvell sas driver wasn't performing very
> well. It turns out that it's setting can_queue not in the SCSI host,
> but in its own internal data structure, meaning it's always operating
> with a global queue depth of one. This patch raises it to what the code
> seemed to be intending ... although I think can_queue should be
> MVS_CHIP_SLOT_SZ - 1 (without the divide by two)?
>
> The good news is that with this change, I'm getting a respectable
> throughput on the fio hammer test; plus zapping random phy resets across
> the disk triggers error handler recovery correctly (so far).
>
> I'm having less happy results with a SATAPI DVD ... it looks like the
> initial IDENTIFY goes across just fine, but that we stall on the other
> SCSI commands ... I'm still investigating this one.
Actually, I've run into another problem with this patch applied. It
looks like NCQ fails with ATA disks. What I see is that I/O goes fine
until I get more than one command outstanding to the device, then the
device stops responding. I can keep the I/O flowing if I clamp the
device queue depth at 1. SAS disks seem to be fine ... I can get
multiple outstanding commands to them correctly serviced.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-03 0:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-29 18:01 [PATCH] mvsas: fix default can_queue James Bottomley
2008-03-03 0:42 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-03-03 8:17 ` Ke Wei
2008-03-03 14:59 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-03 16:40 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-05 2:07 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-05 21:02 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-06 14:46 ` Ke Wei
2008-03-06 15:52 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-06 17:44 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-06 17:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-03-07 10:50 ` Ke Wei
2008-03-07 15:03 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-07 15:31 ` Ke Wei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1204504945.3069.30.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=kewei.mv@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox