From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [patch 0/2] zfcp fixes Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2008 10:33:24 -0500 Message-ID: <1205163204.2941.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080310151852.808020000@de.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:39389 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751158AbYCJPd2 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Mar 2008 11:33:28 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080310151852.808020000@de.ibm.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Christof Schmitt Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2008-03-10 at 16:18 +0100, Christof Schmitt wrote: > James, > > here are two more fixes for zfcp. They apply on scsi-misc. scsi-misc is accumulating paches for the next merge window. If these are fixes as they seem to be, shouldn't they be going into scsi-rc-fixes, which is where bug fixes are accumulated for fast onward transmission? James