From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10226] New: BusLogic Flashpoint SCSI Adapter not working with x86_64 kernels Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:36:50 -0500 Message-ID: <1205347010.2941.127.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20080311134440.fb1609cb.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <47D7B875.4020606@panasas.com> <200803121920.13571.us-@gmx.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:47167 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751351AbYCLSgz (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 14:36:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <200803121920.13571.us-@gmx.de> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Ulrich Schweitzer Cc: Boaz Harrosh , Andrew Morton , bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2008-03-12 at 19:20 +0100, Ulrich Schweitzer wrote: > On Wednesday March 12 2008, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > > An attached config file could help. > > It looks like you need ISA_DMA_API && VIRT_TO_BUS enabled are they? > > They are both enabled, but consider that I didn't customize the kernel in any > way besides changing the processor type to K8 and setting CONFIG_IKCONFIG and > CONFIG_IKCONFIG_PROC. I don't know if I need the options you mentioned. > > I first noticed the problem with a Fedora kernel and compiled this one only to > confirm that the problem exists in the vanilla kernel as well. > > Here is the complete .config: Actually, this is the problem in BusLogic.h: /* FlashPoint support is only available for the Intel x86 Architecture with CONFIG_PCI set. */ #ifndef __i386__ #undef CONFIG_SCSI_OMIT_FLASHPOINT #define CONFIG_SCSI_OMIT_FLASHPOINT #endif #ifndef CONFIG_PCI #undef CONFIG_SCSI_OMIT_FLASHPOINT #define CONFIG_SCSI_OMIT_FLASHPOINT #define BusLogic_InitializeProbeInfoListISA BusLogic_InitializeProbeInfoList #endif Having this dependency logic done in the header file is not very user friendly, but the comment is pretty clear. I can move it to Kconfig, but it will still not work on x86_64 if that comment is accurate. James