From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Tony Jones <tonyj@suse.de>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] convert the scsi layer to use struct device
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2008 12:15:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1205514958.2904.27.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080313210655.GA13468@kroah.com>
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:06 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> Here's a huge patch from Tony and Kay that converts the scsi layer to
> use struct device instead of class_device.
>
> It doesn't seem like it could be split up any smaller due to the
> interconectedness of the whole mess, if you have any suggestions
> otherwise, it would be appreciated.
>
> If you want, I can take this through my tree as it does depend on a
> previous IB patch to make that portion of the patch much smaller.
>
> After this, all of the class_device code is now finally gone from the
> kernel!
Actually, I have it built and running (actually 2.6.25-rc5-mc5 which
includes all the changes in your tree). Amazingly it's pretty much
fully functional, except ses which seems to have suffered a breakdown in
the way its model works. I'll see if I can fix it up.
Since the patch is separable, it's probably best to take it through the
SCSI tree ... including the infiniband bits that depend on the
iser/iscsi transport classes. You can give the rest of the infiniband
pieces to roland, since he's got a nasty set of clashes with the
__FUNCTION__->__func__ conversion which I don't want to be responsible
for.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-14 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-13 21:06 [patch] convert the scsi layer to use struct device Greg KH
2008-03-14 14:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-03-14 17:15 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-03-14 21:20 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-14 21:58 ` Kay Sievers
2008-03-15 14:19 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-15 15:17 ` Kay Sievers
2008-03-15 16:16 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-15 18:01 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-15 18:26 ` Kay Sievers
2008-03-15 18:34 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-15 20:38 ` Stefan Richter
2008-03-15 18:04 ` Kay Sievers
2008-03-15 18:31 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-15 18:56 ` Kay Sievers
2008-03-15 19:33 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-15 19:43 ` Kay Sievers
2008-03-16 20:21 ` James Smart
2008-03-16 21:04 ` Kay Sievers
2008-03-17 4:15 ` James Smart
2008-03-17 5:35 ` Greg KH
2008-03-17 12:18 ` James Smart
2008-03-17 13:40 ` Kay Sievers
2008-03-17 13:55 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-17 17:57 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-19 0:48 ` Greg KH
2008-03-19 20:38 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1205514958.2904.27.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tonyj@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox