* [Bug 6280] new line of Xyratex RAID products and a patch to update for 2.4.x non-sequential LUN mapping
[not found] <bug-6280-11613@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
@ 2008-03-20 7:34 ` bugme-daemon
2008-03-20 13:51 ` James Bottomley
2008-03-20 13:52 ` bugme-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-03-20 7:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280
protasnb@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |protasnb@gmail.com
AssignedTo|scsi_drivers-other@kernel- |linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
|bugs.osdl.org |
------- Comment #2 from protasnb@gmail.com 2008-03-20 00:34 -------
Petros,
This bugzilla is about 2.6.XX. Do you think your patch makes sense for latest
kernels, or this support is already implemented there?
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug 6280] new line of Xyratex RAID products and a patch to update for 2.4.x non-sequential LUN mapping
[not found] <bug-6280-11613@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-03-20 7:34 ` [Bug 6280] new line of Xyratex RAID products and a patch to update for 2.4.x non-sequential LUN mapping bugme-daemon
@ 2008-03-20 13:52 ` bugme-daemon
2008-03-20 16:53 ` bugme-daemon
2008-03-20 16:58 ` bugme-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-03-20 13:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280
------- Comment #3 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-03-20 06:52 -------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 00:34 -0700, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280
>
>
> protasnb@gmail.com changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |protasnb@gmail.com
> AssignedTo|scsi_drivers-other@kernel- |linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> |bugs.osdl.org |
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #2 from protasnb@gmail.com 2008-03-20 00:34 -------
> Petros,
> This bugzilla is about 2.6.XX. Do you think your patch makes sense for latest
> kernels, or this support is already implemented there?
Depends what SCSI level the array reports. If > 2 then the REPORT_LUNS
scan will already have taken care of all of this.
James
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug 6280] new line of Xyratex RAID products and a patch to update for 2.4.x non-sequential LUN mapping
[not found] <bug-6280-11613@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-03-20 7:34 ` [Bug 6280] new line of Xyratex RAID products and a patch to update for 2.4.x non-sequential LUN mapping bugme-daemon
2008-03-20 13:52 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-03-20 16:53 ` bugme-daemon
2008-03-20 16:58 ` bugme-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-03-20 16:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280
------- Comment #4 from pkoutoupis@sbcglobal.net 2008-03-20 09:53 -------
Well, our SCSI level reports 3. But this patch was specific to allow
non-contiguous LUN mappings for our vendor/model array products on the 2.4.x
kernel only. This is never a problem on 2.6.
Seeing how we discontinued support for the 2.4.x and that includes our older
products that were qualified for it, I do not see the need to press on with
this patch.
The bug can be closed. Thank you all for your assistance.
Regards,
Petros Koutoupis
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280
------- Comment #3 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-03-20 06:52
-------
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com
On Thu, 2008-03-20 at 00:34 -0700, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280
>
>
> protasnb@gmail.com changed:
>
> What |Removed |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> CC| |protasnb@gmail.com
> AssignedTo|scsi_drivers-other@kernel- |linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
> |bugs.osdl.org |
>
>
>
>
> ------- Comment #2 from protasnb@gmail.com 2008-03-20 00:34 -------
> Petros,
> This bugzilla is about 2.6.XX. Do you think your patch makes sense for latest
> kernels, or this support is already implemented there?
Depends what SCSI level the array reports. If > 2 then the REPORT_LUNS
scan will already have taken care of all of this.
James
Well, our SCSI level reports 3. But this patch was specific to allow
non-contiguous LUN mappings for our vendor/model array products on the 2.4.x
kernel only. This is never a problem on 2.6.<br> <br> Seeing how we
discontinued support for the 2.4.x and that includes our older products that
were qualified for it, I do not see the need to press on with this patch.<br>
<br> The bug can be closed. Thank you all for your assistance.<br> <br>
Regards,<br> <br> Petros
Koutoupis<br><br><b><i>bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org</i></b>
wrote:<blockquote class="replbq" style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16,
255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;">
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280<br><br><br><br><br><br>-------
Comment #3 from anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org 2008-03-20 06:52
-------<br>Reply-To: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com<br><br>On Thu,
2008-03-20 at 00:34 -0700, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org<br>wrote:<br>>
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280<br>> <br>> <br>>
protasnb@gmail.com changed:<br>> <br>> What |Removed
|Added<br>>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>>
CC| |protasnb@gmail.com<br>>
AssignedTo|scsi_drivers-other@kernel- |linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org<br>>
|bugs.osdl.org |<br>> <br>> <br>>
<br>> <br>> ------- Comment #2 from protasnb@gmail.com 2008-03-20 00:34
-------<br>> Petros,<br>> This bugzilla is about 2.6.XX. Do you think
your patch makes sense for latest<br>> kernels, or this support is already
implemented there?<br><br>Depends what SCSI level the array reports. If > 2
then the REPORT_LUNS<br>scan will already have taken care of all of
this.<br><br>James<br><br><br>-- <br>Configure bugmail:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email<br>------- You are
receiving this mail because: -------<br>You reported the bug, or are watching
the reporter.<br></blockquote><br>
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread* [Bug 6280] new line of Xyratex RAID products and a patch to update for 2.4.x non-sequential LUN mapping
[not found] <bug-6280-11613@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-03-20 16:53 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-03-20 16:58 ` bugme-daemon
3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-03-20 16:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6280
protasnb@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution| |PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE
------- Comment #5 from protasnb@gmail.com 2008-03-20 09:58 -------
Closing the bug, thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread