Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev

[James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>]

On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 21:05 +0200, Jos van der Ende wrote:
> Hello all,
> 
> 
> I did a bit more testing, and I think this may be related to the order in which modules are loaded.
> 
> If I let udev load sungem, and load sym53c8xx manually, everything works.
> 
> If I let udev load sym53c8xx, and load sungem manually, I get the non-functional network.
> 
> If I let udev load both modules, I also get the non-functional network. While udev loads sungem first and sym53c8xx later, I don't suppose it waits for one module to 'settle' before loading the next. :-)

That's odd ... it's behaving like a resource conflict.  However, the
ports and interrupt trace didn't betray anything.  What does lspci -vv
say for each of the devices?  Also, if you remove the sym2 module in the
problem case, does the sungem come back to life?

I'm afraid I can't see anything relevant looking over the sym2 changes,
so you might need to bisect this to identify the culprit.

James