From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Jos van der Ende <seraph@xs4all.nl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:14:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207084454.3100.31.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080401225717.7d936f91.seraph@xs4all.nl>
On Tue, 2008-04-01 at 22:57 +0200, Jos van der Ende wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Apr 2008 15:19:29 -0500
> James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > That's odd ... it's behaving like a resource conflict. However, the
> > ports and interrupt trace didn't betray anything. What does lspci -vv
> > say for each of the devices?
>
> Output from lspci -vv attached.
Thanks ... unfortunately looks normal too. The gem has a single memory
region; the sym2 has 2 mem and one IO region, all of which show up in
the /proc/iomem|ports.
> > Also, if you remove the sym2 module in the
> > problem case, does the sungem come back to life?
>
> No, once it is hosed it stays hosed until the next boot. Fiddling with the wrong ioports maybe?
Yes ... that's what I guess. Just as one last grasp at a straw, is
there any difference in /proc/iomem or /proc/ioports for the working
case (sungem loaded first followed by sym2)?
> > I'm afraid I can't see anything relevant looking over the sym2 changes,
> > so you might need to bisect this to identify the culprit.
>
> Working on that, but it is a hassle as this bitty-box needs some time to compile a kernel. 2.6.23-rc1 didn't boot, for starters.
Sorry ... can't think of much else that will help.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-01 21:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <bug-10374-10286@http.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
2008-04-01 8:15 ` [Bugme-new] [Bug 10374] New: sym53c8xx: weird behavior with udev Andrew Morton
2008-04-01 8:58 ` Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 14:11 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-01 14:47 ` Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 19:05 ` Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 20:19 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-01 20:57 ` Jos van der Ende
2008-04-01 21:14 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-04-01 22:30 ` Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 10:29 ` Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 12:06 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-04-02 14:09 ` Jos van der Ende
2008-04-02 15:49 ` James Bottomley
2008-04-02 16:06 ` Jos van der Ende
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1207084454.3100.31.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seraph@xs4all.nl \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox