From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] [AACRAID] Do not describe check_reset parameter with its value Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 09:39:17 -0500 Message-ID: <1208356757.3227.9.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1208334879.5614.34.camel@compaq.thuisdomein> <7151509B-739F-4568-8C0C-2240C8561B6B@adaptec.com> <1208349780.5614.64.camel@compaq.thuisdomein> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:36860 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752329AbYDPOjV (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:39:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1208349780.5614.64.camel@compaq.thuisdomein> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Bolle Cc: Mark Salyzyn , Linux-Scsi On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 14:43 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote: > From: Paul Bolle > > Do not describe check_reset parameter with its value > > Describe check_reset parameter with its name (and not its value) OK, added this, thanks. There's one slight problem I corrected: > Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle > Signed-off-by: Mark Salyzyn This should be Acked-by not Signed-off-by. The rules are that Signed-off-by tracks the provenance of a patch (where it came from). So if you send the patch to Mark and he sends it to me, it would have his Signed-off-by because it went through his hands (and his tree). If Mark acks the patch, but you send it to me, then it gets an acked-by because it didn't actually pass through his hands. James