From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chandra Seetharaman Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] scsi_dh: Implement generic device table handling Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:32:59 -0700 Message-ID: <1210962779.21974.330.camel@chandra-ubuntu> References: <20080514144310.1EDBC10B5DF@craiglockhart-ipmi.suse.de> <1210819551.21974.252.camel@chandra-ubuntu> <482BE368.3070506@suse.de> Reply-To: sekharan@us.ibm.com, device-mapper development Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <482BE368.3070506@suse.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Hannes Reinecke Cc: James Bottomley , dm-devel , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 09:16 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > > > On the other hand, if we could create a cache of the list of devices > > (vendor-product-scsi_dh triplet) that has been attached, and walk > > thru that list first before others during attach, it would help > > (as we would guess there to be multiple of the same device). > > > Yes, but we can achieve that very same thing by walking the scsi_dh_list. > I'll fix it up. interested in seeing that.