linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	dm-devel <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] scsi_dh: attach to hardware handler from dm-mpath
Date: Fri, 16 May 2008 11:53:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1210964001.21974.351.camel@chandra-ubuntu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <482C0676.9070004@suse.de>


On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 11:46 +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hi Chandra,
> 
> Chandra Seetharaman wrote:
> > What is the purpose of this feature ?
> > 
> > With dh_state functionality, one could associate a handler to a new
> > device and then if one does "multipath", the hardware handler would be
> > associated with the multipath device. What are we achieving by this ?
> > 
> This allows multipath to override the device tables build into
> the device handler. Reason here is that multipath has a configuration
> file which allows the user to override the build-in defaults.
> And this includes the hardware handler, so we need to make sure that
> the hardware handler is indeed attached.

Hardware handler's existence is currently been verified during parsing
(by doing a request_module() followed by scsi_dh_handler_exist() in
parse_hw_handler()).

Hardware handler module is attached to the device itself (thru
try_module_get() in attach), so, the module will exist as long as the
device exists.

Hence, there is no need to attach it again from the multipath layer.

Or, I am missing something totally :)

<snip>



  reply	other threads:[~2008-05-16 18:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-05-14 14:43 [PATCH 7/7] scsi_dh: attach to hardware handler from dm-mpath Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-15  2:50 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-05-15  9:46   ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-16 18:53     ` Chandra Seetharaman [this message]
2008-05-19 10:21       ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-19 18:20         ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-05-20 12:41           ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-20 18:52             ` Chandra Seetharaman
2008-05-21  6:18               ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-22  8:14                 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-23 11:40                   ` Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-23 14:06                     ` James Bottomley
2008-05-19 19:11         ` [dm-devel] Re: [PATCH 7/7] scsi_dh: attach to hardware handler fromdm-mpath Shyam_Iyer
2008-05-19 20:01           ` Chandra Seetharaman
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-20 14:05 [PATCH 7/7] scsi_dh: attach to hardware handler from dm-mpath Hannes Reinecke
2008-05-23  2:08 ` Chandra Seetharaman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1210964001.21974.351.camel@chandra-ubuntu \
    --to=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).