From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] unable to handle kernel paging request in next-20080516
Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 15:26:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1211574403.11477.39.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <g176e5$6fb$1@ger.gmane.org>
On Fri, 2008-05-23 at 20:34 +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> <posted & mailed>
>
> James Bottomley wrote:
>
> > Actually, I think this is a very subtle bug; what I think is happening
> > is that after Hannes sysfs changes, we now add scsi_bus_type to the
> > target device. However, scsi_bus_uevent() unconditionally casts from
> > dev to a struct scsi_device and then looks at the type entry. My theory
> > is that in this particular config going from struct scsi_target to
> > struct device and back to struct scsi_device actually tips us over into
> > unmapped space for the -> type deref.
> >
> > Hopefully this should fix it by checking the device type before doing
> > the deref.
>
> This fixed the problem for me (it was horribly intermittant but I've done
> 10+ consecutive reboots without seeing an oopos). I changed the patch to
> printk everytime the condition was hit and it seems to happen twice per
> PATA device - once after each scsi?: pata_via message and then again after
> each scsi 0:0:0:0: Direct-Accesss ATA DISKID etc : 0 ANSI: 5 .
>
> The thing I don't understand about your explanation is that it sounds like
> the device struct is being round-tripped (but is just being cast to
> different things along the way). If this is the case why would this problem
> ever arise? Surely if it is really a struct scsi_device underneath there
> should be no problem?
The event is called for all generic device objects belonging to the
scsi_bus_type. That means both struct scsi_device and struct
scsi_target objects. When it's called for struct scsi_target objects,
casting out to struct scsi_device does the wrong thing.
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-23 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <g0mkaf$i1r$1@ger.gmane.org>
2008-05-18 9:14 ` [BUG] unable to handle kernel paging request in next-20080516 Andrew Morton
2008-05-18 11:22 ` [BUG] unable to handle kernel paging request in next-20080516 (scsi_bus_uevent) Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-05-18 16:00 ` [BUG] unable to handle kernel paging request in next-20080516 Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-05-18 17:47 ` Greg KH
2008-05-18 20:22 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-05-22 11:34 ` James Bottomley
2008-05-23 19:34 ` Sitsofe Wheeler
2008-05-23 20:26 ` James Bottomley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1211574403.11477.39.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sitsofe@yahoo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox