Re: [RESEND PATCH v2 0/2] Update SCSI target removal path

jthumshirn
2016-03-31T06:58:39Z

On 2016-03-30 18:43, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 09:09 +0200, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
>> [resend with linux-scsi@ in Cc, my apologies]
>>
>> This is a follow up to "scsi: Add intermediate STARGET_REMOVE state
>> to scsi_target_state".
>>
>> If anyone has an idea how to create a regression test suite for the
>> target removal path I'd be all ears, given the fact that this is the
>> 3rd or 4th patch targeting it.
>
> Actually, could you reverse the order of these patches, please. It's
> not safe to revert the soft lockup fix until after the intermediate
> state is introduced. I'd rather we didn't go through a point in the
> tree where the bug exists again.

You're right. I'll resend the series in reverse order.