From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Development <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression] CD-DA delay needed after insertion (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10974)
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 10:51:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1214841102.3381.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0806301120570.10868@vixen.sonytel.be>
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 11:25 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > git-bisect taught me it was introduced by
> > >
> > > commit 38582a62ecd337de4212004c7d4844899dc57890
> > > Author: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> > > Date: Wed Feb 6 13:01:58 2008 -0600
> > >
> > > [SCSI] sr: fix test unit ready responses
> > >
> > > Commit 210ba1d1724f5c4ed87a2ab1a21ca861a915f734 updated sr.c to use
> > > the scsi_test_unit_ready() function. Unfortunately, this has the
> > > wrong characteristic of eating NOT_READY returns which sr.c relies on
> > > for tray status.
> > >
> > > Fix by rolling an internal sr_test_unit_ready() that doesn't do this.
> >
> > OK, I thought I had a test case for this, but when I revert this commit
> > on git head (and fix up the one reject which just leaves the sr_
> > function in place) I still produce the same behaviour.
> >
> > What I'm trying is
> >
> > sg_start -i -l <cdrom>
> >
> > to close the tray followed by your cdparanoia command
> >
> > Could you see if reverting this commit on git head works for you (in
> > which case I'm not reproducing it correctly)?
>
> On 9bedbcb207ed9a571b239231d99c8fd4a34ae24d, the sequence
>
> eject; sg_start -i -l /dev/scd0; cdparanoia \
> -d /dev/scd0 -Z -q 1-1[:1] /dev/null || echo failed
>
> fails with
>
> 004: Unable to read table of contents header
>
> After reverting 38582a62ecd337de4212004c7d4844899dc57890, it works.
>
> I added the eject as the PS3 has a slot-loading drive.
>
> With kind regards,
OK ... but this doesn't happen for me with or without this commit
reverted. This is what I see from stracing cdparanoia:
lstat64("/dev/scd0", {st_mode=S_IFBLK|0660, st_rdev=makedev(11, 0), ...}) = 0
open("/dev/scd0", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 3
ioctl(3, SG_IO, 0xbfc0afdc) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
close(3) = 0
open("/dev/scd0", O_RDWR|O_NONBLOCK) = 3
dup(3) = 4
ioctl(3, CDROMAUDIOBUFSIZ or SCSI_IOCTL_GET_IDLUN, 0xbfc0b240) = 0
ioctl(3, SCSI_IOCTL_GET_BUS_NUMBER, 0xbfc0b248) = 0
ioctl(3, SG_IO, 0xbfc0af8c) = 0
ioctl(4, SG_EMULATED_HOST, 0xbfc0b2b8) = 0
ioctl(3, SG_IO, 0xbfc0b07c) = 0
ioctl(3, SG_IO, 0xbfc0b04c) = 0
write(2, "004: Unable to read table of con"..., 45004: Unable to read table of contents header) = 45
The O_NONBLOCK tells the cdrom layer not to do drive ready processing.
The three SG_IOs are INQUIRY, MODE_SENSE(10) and READ TOC/PMA/ATIP
The latter one is returned with a check condition and sense data not
ready; medium not present - tray open.
There's no way the drive ready processing can have an effect on this
sequence unless cdparanoia either invokes it from the cdrom layer or
processes the not ready itself. Could you strace your cdparanoia and
see what sequence it is using?
Thanks,
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-30 15:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-13 11:57 [regression] CD-DA delay needed after insertion Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-15 12:46 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-06-15 14:33 ` James Bottomley
2008-06-15 14:39 ` James Bottomley
2008-06-16 15:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-16 20:30 ` James Bottomley
2008-06-17 13:31 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-18 20:40 ` James Bottomley
2008-06-19 9:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-27 22:27 ` James Bottomley
2008-06-30 9:25 ` [regression] CD-DA delay needed after insertion (http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10974) Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-30 15:51 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-07-01 15:18 ` James Bottomley
2008-09-17 15:05 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-30 8:17 ` Monty Montgomery
2008-09-30 12:33 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-30 12:48 ` Monty Montgomery
2008-09-30 12:51 ` Monty Montgomery
2008-09-30 14:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-30 15:07 ` Monty Montgomery
2008-09-30 15:21 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-30 17:32 ` Monty Montgomery
2008-09-30 17:41 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-30 17:45 ` Matthew Wilcox
2008-09-30 18:10 ` Monty Montgomery
2008-10-01 7:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-09-30 13:37 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-07-30 13:06 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2008-06-17 22:56 ` [regression] CD-DA delay needed after insertion Chuck Ebbert
2008-06-17 22:59 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1214841102.3381.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=Geert.Uytterhoeven@sonycom.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox