From: Christophe Varoqui <christophe.varoqui@free.fr>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: persistent reservation behaviour with dm-multipath
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 10:59:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1216457992.7364.15.camel@plop> (raw)
The current dm-multipath behaviour is currently a potent data corrupter
on Persistant Reservation-based clusters sharing multipaths with the
queue_if_no_path feature on (Clariion, Storageworks, ...).
Consider the following scenario :
- Node A take a write-exclusive persistent reservation on LU
- Node B submits a write io to LU, which is a sda-sdb multipath
- B dm_multipath routes the wio to sda, the wio is failed, the path is
marked failed
- B dm_multipath routes the wio to sdb, the wio is failed, the last
path is marked failed
- B queues the wio because of the queue_if_no_path feature. Process
submitting the wio is stuck in D-state.
- A releases the reservation. Queued wios are unqueued, corrupting the
data on LU.
I suspect wio returning a "reservation conflict" status should never be
queued.
DM suspend/resume on the multipath devmap effectively flushes the queue,
but this solution leaves a window open for data corruption, between io
enqueue and user-space driven queue flush.
Is there work in progress to address this issue yet ? What's would be an
acceptable solution design (for example Mike Christie suggested in Aug
2005 a scsi-to-blk error translation patch, which got nowhere) ?
Regards,
cvaroqui
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next reply other threads:[~2008-07-19 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-19 8:59 Christophe Varoqui [this message]
2008-07-23 20:28 ` persistent reservation behaviour with dm-multipath Douglas Gilbert
2008-07-23 21:09 ` Christophe Varoqui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1216457992.7364.15.camel@plop \
--to=christophe.varoqui@free.fr \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox