From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Subtle but oops causing problem with class_device->device conversion
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:06:30 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1217354790.6103.36.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1217354388.31362.2.camel@linux.site>
On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 19:59 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-07-29 at 12:42 -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > It's taken me a while to track this down. Basically there's an oops in
> > scsi_transport_spi that's directly caused by this.
> >
> > What happened is that you made all class devices become real devices and
> > be parented to devices they were formerly allied to through the class
> > device dev pointer. This means that effectively you expanded the child
> > list of every device to include not only its real children but also its
> > class devices.
> >
> > This breaks in device_for_each_child *if* the routine in the iterator
> > doesn't perform checks on the devices it gets back (scsi_transport_spi
> > was assuming that every device it got was embedded in a struct
> > scsi_device because they're the only logical children of a scsi_target).
> >
> > I can fix the SCSI breakage, but the whole tree will need auditing to
> > check that nothing else is using this assumption.
>
> I guess it's caused by:
> [SCSI] add scsi_host and scsi_target to scsi_bus
>
> This patch implements scsi_host and scsi_target device types
> and adds both to the scsi_bus.
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=b0ed43360fdca227048d88a08290365cb681c1a8
>
> and not by the re-parenting, so it should be limited to SCSI, right?
No .. read the email. It's caused by adding extra children to the
device via the class_device conversion. device_for_each_child doesn't
care what the type is (although that might be a potential generic fix
for this).
So, it's definitely not confined to SCSI.
James
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-29 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-29 17:42 Subtle but oops causing problem with class_device->device conversion James Bottomley
2008-07-29 17:59 ` Kay Sievers
2008-07-29 18:06 ` James Bottomley [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1217354790.6103.36.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox