Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Vladislav Bolkhovitin <vst@vlnb.net>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	ksummit-2008-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	"Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>,
	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
	scst-devel <scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Kernel Summit Request for	Discussion: The Future of Target mode and Cloud storage on Linux
Date: Fri, 22 Aug 2008 14:13:21 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1219432401.3339.79.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <48AF0CC9.6060904@vlnb.net>

On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 23:00 +0400, Vladislav Bolkhovitin wrote:
> James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 18:31 -0500, Mike Christie wrote:
> >> I think James also said something about moving STGT in-kernel to get 
> >> performance gains, but I do not think it means that we have to push 
> >> exact code that sits in Tomo's git tree from usrspace into the kernel. 
> >> If along the way we replace it with scst or Nick's code and we end up 
> >> with a variant of scst or Nicks code that can still support userspace 
> >> targets then I do not think any one is going to make long threads like 
> >> these have resulted in :)
> > 
> > I meant actually allowing performance critical pieces to work either
> > in-user or in-kernel.  How, I'm not sure ... if we could use the same
> > code for both, that would be brilliant ... if we have to have separate
> > pieces, that will be OK.
> > 
> > The error injection and transport debug people think it's important to
> > have the state machine in user space for fast prototyping and debugging,
> > so I'm not going to take this away from them.
> 
> Nobody has been asking you about that. Simply, there's no need in it.

I wasn't aware you were privy to my conversations ... however, I suggest
that you must have missed it.

Quite a few people who want to work on transports don't have the budget
for the hardware.  Emulators are things they use to get around this
problem.  To them, therefore, it's a definite need.

> >> Will this work for everyone?
> > 
> > Sounds like a plan.  (However, it also sounds suspiciously like the last
> > plan we had from the storage summit which didn't actually attract any
> > implementers ...)
> 
> I at that time heard nothing about it. Nobody asked me, nobody let me 
> know about it and nobody asked me to participate. Nothing about it was 
> in linux-scsi. It was completely behind my back.

http://www.usenix.org/events/lsf08/

summaries page 6.

The invitation to participate was here:

http://marc.info/?t=119325401900042

James



  reply	other threads:[~2008-08-22 19:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-08-21 19:42 [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Kernel Summit Request for Discussion: The Future of Target mode and Cloud storage on Linux Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-21 23:19 ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-22 19:01   ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-23  2:35     ` FUJITA Tomonori
2008-08-27 18:00       ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-21 23:31 ` [Ksummit-2008-discuss] " Mike Christie
2008-08-21 23:53   ` James Bottomley
2008-08-22 19:00     ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-22 19:13       ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-08-27 17:49         ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-22 18:59   ` [Ksummit-2008-discuss] " Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-22 19:05     ` Arjan van de Ven
2008-08-22 19:46     ` Mike Christie
2008-08-27 17:51       ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-25 21:59   ` [Ksummit-2008-discuss] " Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-08-27 17:56     ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-27 17:59       ` [Scst-devel] " Ming Zhang
2008-08-28 17:48         ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-27 22:13       ` Kernel Level Generic Target Mode control path Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-08-27 22:40         ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-08-28 17:52           ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-28 17:52         ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-28 18:00           ` James Bottomley
2008-08-28 23:08           ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-08-28 23:28             ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-08-29 16:28             ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-29 20:10               ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-08-30 20:53                 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-31 18:18                   ` Bart Van Assche
2008-09-02 21:25                   ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-09-19 17:50                     ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-31 18:42               ` Bart Van Assche
2008-09-19 17:50                 ` Vladislav Bolkhovitin
2008-08-22  0:26 ` [Ksummit-2008-discuss] Kernel Summit Request for Discussion: The Future of Target mode and Cloud storage on Linux Arjan van de Ven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1219432401.3339.79.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
    --cc=ksummit-2008-discuss@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
    --cc=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
    --cc=scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=vst@vlnb.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox