* [PATCH] fc_transport: fix old bug on bitflag definitions
@ 2008-11-20 15:58 James Smart
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: James Smart @ 2008-11-20 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
I thought we had corrected this a while ago - however, it's still
in 2.6.28-rc?.
When the fastfail flag was added, it did not account for the flags
being bit fields. Correct the definition so there is no longer a
conflict.
James - we need to get this into 2.6.28
-- james s
Signed-off-by: James Smart <james.smart@emulex.com>
---
scsi_transport_fc.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff -upNr a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h
--- a/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h 2008-10-18 10:32:54.000000000 -0400
+++ b/include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h 2008-11-20 10:54:02.000000000 -0500
@@ -357,7 +357,7 @@ struct fc_rport { /* aka fc_starget_attr
/* bit field values for struct fc_rport "flags" field: */
#define FC_RPORT_DEVLOSS_PENDING 0x01
#define FC_RPORT_SCAN_PENDING 0x02
-#define FC_RPORT_FAST_FAIL_TIMEDOUT 0x03
+#define FC_RPORT_FAST_FAIL_TIMEDOUT 0x04
#define dev_to_rport(d) \
container_of(d, struct fc_rport, dev)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2008-11-20 15:57 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-11-20 15:58 [PATCH] fc_transport: fix old bug on bitflag definitions James Smart
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox