From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@linux-iscsi.org>
To: Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>,
Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux-iSCSI.org Target Dev"
<linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Changes to Linux/SCSI target mode infrastructure for v2.6.28
Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2008 16:47:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1228265226.6229.127.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1228259916.6229.119.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org>
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 15:18 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 01:13 -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
> > Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 00:30 -0800, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 22:40 -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
> > > > > Nicholas A. Bellinger <nab@linux-iscsi.org> wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 13:18 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >>> The other one is a BUG_ON in blk/blk-timeout.c:177 in blk_add_timeout()
> > > > > > > >>> that happens after a few hundred MB of READ_10 traffic, which also
> > > > > > > >>> appears to pass through elv_dequeue_request() at some point:
> > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > >>> http://linux-iscsi.org/builds/user/nab/2.6.28-rc6-oops-2.png
> > > > > > > >>> http://linux-iscsi.org/builds/user/nab/2.6.28-rc6-oops-4.png
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hmmm... this means blk_add_timer() is being called after the request
> > > > > > > is already completed.
> > > > >
> > > > > or is it possible since elv_dequeue_request BUG_ON check of queuelist did
> > > > > not trigger a request is on the queuelist with a timeout_list not empty.
> > > > >
> > > > > It would be interesting for a debug run to change the
> > > > > "BUG_ON(!list_empty(&req->timeout_list))" in blk_add_timer to print out
> > > > > the cmd_flags plus req->atomic_flags and also add a
> > > > > "BUG_ON(!list_empty(&rq->timeout_list))" to elv_insert to ensure a request
> > > > > is never added to the queuelist with a timeout_list not empty.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok, so blk_dump_rq_flags() is now being called in
> > > > block/blk-timeout.c:blk_add_timer() for the case
> > > > BUG_ON(list_empty(&req->timeout_list)) case:
> > > >
> > > > http://linux-iscsi.org/builds/user/nab/2.6.28-rc6-oops-6.png
> > > >
> > > > Hmm, the outputted "sector " range is definately is bogus, as the only
> > > > READ_10 that have been sent are at LBA offset 0 for 8 * 512 byte sectors
> > > > for the partition table during Open/iSCSI LUN scanning.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Also, the following code from block/blk-core.c:blk_dump_rq_flags():
> > >
> > > if (blk_pc_request(rq)) {
> > > printk(KERN_INFO " cdb: ");
> > > for (bit = 0; bit < BLK_MAX_CDB; bit++)
> > > printk("%02x ", rq->cmd[bit]);
> > > printk("\n");
> > > }
> > >
> > > is not printing out the copied CDB in struct request->cmd[], which makes
> > > me think the struct request->cmd_flags (that blk_pc_request() is
> > > checking) are also bogus when blk_add_timer() is being called..
> > >
> > Based on the output from 2.6.28-rc6-oops-6.png the flags value of 82c21
> > looks like
> > (__REQ_ALLOCED,__REQ_ELVPRIV,__REQ_DONTPREP,__REQ_STARTED,__REQ_SORTED,__REQ_RW),
> > but it is late so someone maybe should check my shift counts.
> >
> > The type is also REQ_TYPE_FS so the blk_pc cdb: info will not be printed.
> >
> > I will talk to you more in the morning.
> >
>
> Ok, after double checking the original patch again, I noticed that
> struct request was getting released with __blk_put_request() from the
> struct request->end_io() caller context in pscsi_req_done(), and again
> after the original target mode CDB was acknowledged from the fabric in
> pscsi_free_task() with blk_put_request().. Not good.
>
> Anyways, I removed the extra blk_put_request() in pscsi_free_task() and
> am running some badblocks tests now. Things are obviously looking much
> better.
>
Ok, passing badblocks tests now and looking stable on v2.6.28-rc7 using
Tejun's patch, here the commit diff for the LIO-Core v3.0 PSCSI changes:
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/nab/lio-core-2.6.git;a=commitdiff;h=1b14b5e1fc9a7074322b1015bb86eca2a8ef4560
Now the question becomes, how can we get rid of scsi_req_map_sg() usage
(and struct bio in between) all together..?
--nab
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-03 0:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-02 1:52 Changes to Linux/SCSI target mode infrastructure for v2.6.28 Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-12-02 2:04 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-12-02 3:10 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-12-02 3:25 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-12-02 3:43 ` Tejun Heo
2008-12-02 4:18 ` Tejun Heo
2008-12-02 5:05 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-12-02 6:40 ` Mike Anderson
2008-12-02 7:49 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-12-02 8:30 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-12-02 8:35 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-12-02 9:13 ` Mike Anderson
2008-12-02 23:18 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
2008-12-03 0:47 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger [this message]
2008-12-02 8:39 ` Boaz Harrosh
2008-12-02 10:34 ` Nicholas A. Bellinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1228265226.6229.127.camel@haakon2.linux-iscsi.org \
--to=nab@linux-iscsi.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jens.axboe@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-iscsi-target-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox