From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove ide-scsi Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 09:09:00 -0600 Message-ID: <1228316941.5551.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <20081203103856S.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20081203100643.GA29340@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20081203100643.GA29340@infradead.org> Sender: linux-ide-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: FUJITA Tomonori , bzolnier@gmail.com, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, osst@riede.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2008-12-03 at 05:06 -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 10:38:54AM +0900, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > > This is for 2.6.29 (not 2.6.28) as feature-removal-schedule.txt says. > > > > It's against linux-next (which seems to has some changes to ide-scsi > > for 2.6.29 from the ide tree). > > Isn't ide-scsi the only way to use ATAPI OnStream tapes supported by > the osst driver? Depends. If you're still using drivers/ide then yes, it is. With libata (which is what most modern distros use), osst just works as an ATAPI transport. git log tells me ide-scsi has been updated quite a bit recently, but it mostly looks to be fallout around the drivers/ide churn. Can we get ide maintainer's buy in for this (I think they've been maintaining ide-tape and ide-cd in preference to ide-scsi)? James