public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Mike Anderson <andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Bug 12195] "dd" make kernel panic
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:28:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1229110109.3262.87.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1229094577.3262.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 09:09 -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-12-12 at 02:22 -0800, Mike Anderson wrote:
> > bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org <bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org> wrote:
> > > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12195
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ------- Comment #6 from ming.m.lin@intel.com  2008-12-11 18:27 -------
> > > 2.6.28-rc8 also panic
> > 
> > The blk_mark_rq_complete check should prevent completions from occurring on
> > already timed out requests unless the interaction previous mentioned between
> > mpt_fault_reset_work and the scsi eh thread requeue alows the REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE
> > bit to get cleared prior to the scsi_done being called from
> > mptscsih_flush_running_cmds. This did not look obvious to hit.
> > 
> > mpt_fault_reset_work
> > 	mpt_HardResetHandler
> > 		mpt_signal_reset
> > 			mptsas_ioc_reset 
> > 				mptscsih_flush_running_cmds
> > 		mpt_do_ioc_recovery
> 
> Actually, this isn't quite true.  Particularly in the eh case.  It looks
> like the block timeout isn't stopped until blk_complete_request() which
> is pretty late.  If the timeout fires after scsi_done is called but
> before we complete the request, any timeout goes through the
> BLK_EH_HANDLED path to __blk_complete_request().  This routine
> unconditionally adds to the done routine without checking the mark, so
> there is a window where we can get double dones.

Actually, I take that back ... the patch to plug the unprep race was
send over the list but never applied because the timer changes seemed to
fix the problem.

So, we still have a small window where unprep can NULL out rq->special
while an asynchronous mpt reset is flushing the commands via scsi_done.

Could you see if it goes away (or at least lessens in frequency) with
this patch?

Thanks,

James

---

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
index 111f9e9..f2f51e0 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_lib.c
@@ -653,8 +653,8 @@ static void scsi_requeue_command(struct request_queue *q, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
 	struct request *req = cmd->request;
 	unsigned long flags;
 
-	scsi_unprep_request(req);
 	spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
+	scsi_unprep_request(req);
 	blk_requeue_request(q, req);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
 



  reply	other threads:[~2008-12-12 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-11  2:07 [Bug 12195] New: "dd" make kernel panic bugme-daemon
2008-12-11  2:09 ` [Bug 12195] " bugme-daemon
2008-12-11  2:15 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-11  3:12 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-11  9:05 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-11 15:17   ` James Bottomley
2008-12-11  9:26 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-11 15:17 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-11 19:45 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-12  2:27 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-12 10:22   ` Mike Anderson
2008-12-12 15:09     ` James Bottomley
2008-12-12 19:28       ` James Bottomley [this message]
2008-12-12 10:22 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-12 15:09 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-12 19:28 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-13 17:58 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-15  9:52 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-15 10:39 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-15 20:13   ` James Bottomley
2008-12-15 20:13 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-16  5:12 ` bugme-daemon
2008-12-21 19:52 ` bugme-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1229110109.3262.87.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=andmike@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox