From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>,
"Wilcox, Matthew R" <matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com>,
chinang.ma@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
sharad.c.tripathi@intel.com, arjan@linux.intel.com,
andi.kleen@intel.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com,
harita.chilukuri@intel.com, douglas.w.styner@intel.com,
peter.xihong.wang@intel.com, hubert.nueckel@intel.com,
chris.mason@oracle.com, srostedt@redhat.com,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Vasquez <andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com>,
Anirban Chakraborty <anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com>
Subject: Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:12:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1232028766.5966.10.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090114180431.f4a96543.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, 2009-01-14 at 18:04 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:21:47 -0700 Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:35:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > > Linux OLTP Performance summary
> > > > > Kernel# Speedup(x) Intr/s CtxSw/s us% sys% idle% iowait%
> > > > > 2.6.24.2 1.000 21969 43425 76 24 0 0
> > > > > 2.6.27.2 0.973 30402 43523 74 25 0 1
> > > > > 2.6.29-rc1 0.965 30331 41970 74 26 0 0
> >
> > > But the interrupt rate went through the roof.
> >
> > Yes. I forget why that was; I'll have to dig through my archives for
> > that.
>
> Oh. I'd have thought that this alone could account for 3.5%.
Me too. Anecdotally, I haven't noticed this in my lab machines, but
what I have noticed is on someone else's laptop (a hyperthreaded atom)
that I was trying to demo powertop on was that IPI reschedule interrupts
seem to be out of control ... they were ticking over at a really high
rate and preventing the CPU from spending much time in the low C and P
states. To me this implicates some scheduler problem since that's the
primary producer of IPI reschedules ... I think it wouldn't be a
significant extrapolation to predict that the scheduler might be the
cause of the above problem as well.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-15 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <BC02C49EEB98354DBA7F5DD76F2A9E800317003CB0@azsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
[not found] ` <CAC4B8726E86A142B27A9E9A2F2F12479D3E945F@rrsmsx505.amr.corp.intel.com>
2009-01-15 0:35 ` Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Andrew Morton
2009-01-15 1:21 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-15 2:04 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-15 2:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-15 7:11 ` Ma, Chinang
2009-01-19 18:04 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-19 18:37 ` Steven Rostedt
[not found] ` <1232390259.25783.5.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2009-01-19 18:55 ` Chris Mason
2009-01-19 19:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-19 23:40 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-01-15 2:39 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-15 2:47 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-15 3:36 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-20 13:27 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <588992150B702C48B3312184F1B810AD03A497632C@azsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
2009-01-22 11:29 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <588992150B702C48B3312184F1B810AD03A4F59632@azsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
2009-01-27 8:28 ` Jens Axboe
2009-01-15 7:24 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-15 9:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-15 13:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-15 14:42 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-16 10:16 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-16 10:21 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 10:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-16 10:42 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 10:55 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-19 7:13 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-19 8:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-19 8:33 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-19 8:42 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-19 8:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-19 8:57 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-19 9:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-19 10:03 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 20:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-16 0:27 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 4:03 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 4:12 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 6:46 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 6:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-16 7:06 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 7:53 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-16 10:20 ` Andi Kleen
2009-01-20 5:16 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-21 23:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-22 8:36 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-22 9:15 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-22 9:28 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-22 9:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 3:02 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-23 6:52 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 8:06 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 8:30 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-23 8:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 9:46 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 15:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 15:31 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-23 15:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-01-23 16:01 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-24 2:55 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-24 7:36 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-12 5:22 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-02-12 5:47 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-02-12 15:25 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-12 16:07 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-02-12 16:03 ` Pekka Enberg
2009-01-26 17:36 ` Christoph Lameter
2009-02-01 2:52 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-23 8:33 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-23 9:02 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-23 18:40 ` care and feeding of netperf (Re: Mainline kernel OLTP performance update) Rick Jones
2009-01-23 18:51 ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-24 3:03 ` Zhang, Yanmin
2009-01-26 18:26 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-16 7:00 ` Mainline kernel OLTP performance update Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 7:25 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 8:59 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-16 18:11 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-19 7:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-01-19 22:19 ` Rick Jones
2009-01-15 14:12 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-01-15 17:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-15 18:00 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-01-15 18:14 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-15 18:44 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-01-15 18:46 ` Wilcox, Matthew R
2009-01-15 19:44 ` Ma, Chinang
2009-01-16 18:14 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-01-16 19:09 ` Steven Rostedt
2009-01-20 12:45 ` Gregory Haskins
2009-01-15 19:28 ` Ma, Chinang
2009-01-15 16:48 ` Ma, Chinang
[not found] <D7C42C27E6CB1E4D8CBDF2F81EA92A260345836A3A@azsmsx501.amr.corp.intel.com>
2009-04-27 7:02 ` Andi Kleen
2009-04-28 16:57 ` Chuck Ebbert
2009-04-28 17:15 ` James Bottomley
2009-04-28 17:17 ` Styner, Douglas W
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1232028766.5966.10.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi.kleen@intel.com \
--cc=andrew.vasquez@qlogic.com \
--cc=anirban.chakraborty@qlogic.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chinang.ma@intel.com \
--cc=chris.mason@oracle.com \
--cc=douglas.w.styner@intel.com \
--cc=harita.chilukuri@intel.com \
--cc=hubert.nueckel@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.r.wilcox@intel.com \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=peter.xihong.wang@intel.com \
--cc=sharad.c.tripathi@intel.com \
--cc=srostedt@redhat.com \
--cc=suresh.b.siddha@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox