From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com"
<james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"jgarzik@redhat.com" <jgarzik@redhat.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"james.smart@emulex.com" <james.smart@emulex.com>,
"michaelc@cs.wisc.edu" <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>,
"jeykholt@cisco.com" <jeykholt@cisco.com>,
"andi@firstfloor.org" <andi@firstfloor.org>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] fcoe: Fibre Channel over Ethernet
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 11:05:17 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1233947117.7785.5.camel@fritz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090204182441.4a8def70.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, 2009-02-04 at 18:24 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Dec 2008 15:10:24 -0800 Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com> wrote:
>
> > Encapsulation protocol for running Fibre Channel over Ethernet interfaces.
> > Creates virtual Fibre Channel host adapters using libfc.
> >
> > This layer is the LLD to the scsi-ml. It allocates the Scsi_Host, utilizes
> > libfc for Fibre Channel protocol processing and interacts with netdev to
> > send/receive Ethernet packets.
> >
>
> I stumbled across this while looking for new and weird kthread API usages..
>
I just sent a patchset of Open-FCoE updates to linux-scsi. Patches in
that set should take care of the kernel-doc issues, the initialization
ordering problem for fcoe transports, the typos, the timer comments, and
the unnecessary casting problem.
> > ...
> >
> > +/**
> > + * fcoe_transport_lookup - check if the transport is already registered
> > + * @t: the transport to be looked up
> > + *
> > + * This compares the parent device (pci) vendor and device id
> > + *
> > + * Returns: NULL if not found
> > + *
> > + * TODO - return default sw transport if no other transport is found
> > + **/
>
> The kerneldoc comments consistently close with
>
> **/
>
> which is consistently unconventional. Not wrong, just odd.
>
I did change the kernel-doc function comment blocks to end with '*/',
since you called it out. I looked at the other comments under
drivers/scsi/ and most did end in '*/'. However, the
Documentation/kernel-doc-nano-HOWTO.txt has an example for function
headers that shows '**/' as the suggested style. Should the kernel-doc
HOWTO be updated?
Example kernel-doc function comment:
/**
* foobar() - short function description of foobar
* @arg1: Describe the first argument to foobar.
* @arg2: Describe the second argument to foobar.
* One can provide multiple line descriptions
* for arguments.
*
* A longer description, with more discussion of the function foobar()
* that might be useful to those using or modifying it. Begins with
* empty comment line, and may include additional embedded empty
* comment lines.
*
* The longer description can have multiple paragraphs.
**/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-06 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-12-09 23:10 [PATCH 0/3] Open-FCoE Submission (round 2) Robert Love
2008-12-09 23:10 ` [PATCH 1/3] FC protocol definition header files Robert Love
2008-12-09 23:10 ` [PATCH 2/3] libfc: A modular Fibre Channel library Robert Love
2008-12-10 0:03 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-10 18:42 ` Vasu Dev
2008-12-10 19:42 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-12 1:55 ` Vasu Dev
2008-12-12 2:19 ` Joe Eykholt
2008-12-11 0:44 ` Chris Leech
2008-12-11 0:49 ` Chris Leech
2008-12-11 20:32 ` Zou, Yi
2008-12-11 23:33 ` Andi Kleen
2008-12-09 23:10 ` [PATCH 3/3] fcoe: Fibre Channel over Ethernet Robert Love
2009-02-05 2:24 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-06 19:05 ` Robert Love [this message]
2009-02-06 19:13 ` Andrew Morton
2009-02-06 19:26 ` [PATCH] kernel-doc: preferred ending marker and examples Randy Dunlap
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-11-18 22:20 [PATCH 0/3] Open-FCoE Submission Robert Love
2008-11-18 22:21 ` [PATCH 3/3] fcoe: Fibre Channel over Ethernet Robert Love
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1233947117.7785.5.camel@fritz \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=james.smart@emulex.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=jeykholt@cisco.com \
--cc=jgarzik@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=michaelc@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).