public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] firs round of SCSI bug fixes for 2.6.29-rc1
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:42:19 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1234356139.3295.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090211040806.GQ31509@parisc-linux.org>

On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 21:08 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:17:23PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 09:56:11AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote:
> > >       mpt fusion: Add separate msi enable disable for FC,SPI,SAS
> > 
> > I thought we rejected this one as being completely bogus?  I certainly
> > don't remember seeing even an excuse for it after I challenged it.
> 
> ... no response?

>From whom?  It's no less bogus than what they were doing previously.  I
happen to think the whole idea of drivers chosing msi/not msi by
parameters is bogus ... we just don't have a good platform way of
sorting it out at the moment.  In that absence, the driver maintainer
gets to fix up.

James



      reply	other threads:[~2009-02-11 12:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-16 14:56 [GIT PATCH] firs round of SCSI bug fixes for 2.6.29-rc1 James Bottomley
2009-01-16 17:09 ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 18:48   ` James Bottomley
2009-01-16 19:07     ` Andrew Morton
2009-01-16 20:28       ` James Bottomley
2009-01-16 19:09     ` David Miller
2009-01-16 19:02   ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-16 19:10     ` David Miller
2009-01-16 20:09       ` Grant Grundler
2009-01-16 20:15         ` James Bottomley
2009-01-17 21:17 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-11  4:08   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-11 12:42     ` James Bottomley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1234356139.3295.6.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox