From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Bottomley Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] firs round of SCSI bug fixes for 2.6.29-rc1 Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:42:19 -0500 Message-ID: <1234356139.3295.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1232117771.3224.21.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090117211723.GB30719@parisc-linux.org> <20090211040806.GQ31509@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from accolon.hansenpartnership.com ([76.243.235.52]:35464 "EHLO accolon.hansenpartnership.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752763AbZBKMmW (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:42:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090211040806.GQ31509@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-scsi , linux-kernel On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 21:08 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 02:17:23PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 09:56:11AM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: > > > mpt fusion: Add separate msi enable disable for FC,SPI,SAS > > > > I thought we rejected this one as being completely bogus? I certainly > > don't remember seeing even an excuse for it after I challenged it. > > ... no response? >>From whom? It's no less bogus than what they were doing previously. I happen to think the whole idea of drivers chosing msi/not msi by parameters is bogus ... we just don't have a good platform way of sorting it out at the moment. In that absence, the driver maintainer gets to fix up. James