From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: "Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)" <narayanan.rengarajan@hp.com>
Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] : Spinning up disk is observed on standby paths until timeout, resulting in longer path restoration time.
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:36:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235144182.3349.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DB8E544DD4B3D346A36F2698103530AE292A9BDC54@GVW1105EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 11:14 +0000, Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Spinning up disk is observed on standby paths until timeout, resulting in longer path restoration time in 2.6.27 kernel.
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> 1. present a standby lun to the host
> 2. do a discovery from the host (scan the scsi bus)
> 3. Spinning of disks is observed in /var/log/messages
>
> Whenever a device goes offline and comes back, the new sd device takes longer
> time to get created. This is because of the spinning up of disk in
> sd_spinup_disk fuction as the standby paths would return device not ready with
> 0x04/0x0b asc/ascq.
>
> Recommended patch :
>
> diff -pNaur /usr/src/linux/drivers/scsi/sd.c sd.c
> --- /usr/src/linux/drivers/scsi/sd.c 2009-02-09 22:24:56.000000000 +0530
> +++ sd.c 2009-02-19 16:39:16.000000000 +0530
> @@ -1181,8 +1181,8 @@ sd_spinup_disk(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
> */
> if (sense_valid &&
> sshdr.sense_key == NOT_READY &&
> - sshdr.asc == 4 && sshdr.ascq == 3) {
> - break; /* manual intervention required */
> + sshdr.asc == 4 && (sshdr.ascq == 3 || sshdr.ascq == 0x0b ||
> sshdr.ascq == 0x0c) ) {
> + break; /* manual intervention required || Standby ||
This really doesn't look right ASC/ASCQ 0x04/0x0b is LUN not accessible;
target *port* in standby state. That's supposed to be because it was put
into a standby state according to SPC3(r23) 5.8.2.4.4
I don't see how a port (target) is expected to come out of standby with
a LUN command. The standard implies you need to do it with a set target
port groups command. What array is actually giving this?
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-20 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-20 11:14 [PATCH 1/1] : Spinning up disk is observed on standby paths until timeout, resulting in longer path restoration time Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)
2009-02-20 15:36 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2009-02-20 15:52 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-20 16:03 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 16:13 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-20 16:24 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 17:04 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-23 11:48 ` Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)
2009-02-23 14:52 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-28 21:26 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-28 23:56 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235144182.3349.5.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=narayanan.rengarajan@hp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox