From: Robert Love <robert.w.love@intel.com>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: robert.w.love@intel.com
Subject: Initial nice value for FCoE receive threads
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:13:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235600022.7691.272.camel@fritz> (raw)
fcoe.ko uses per-CPU kernel threads to process the incoming frames. We
used to nice to -19, but a typo during our re-architecture phase fliped
that value to 19. I think a performance review will help to determine a
good value, but for now I'm trying to figure out a decent starting
value. Both lpfc and qla2xxx use -20 for their threads, but I don't
think that they're per-CPU. Is -20 a good initial nice value for
fcoe.ko?
reply other threads:[~2009-02-25 22:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1235600022.7691.272.camel@fritz \
--to=robert.w.love@intel.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox