public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: "Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)" <narayanan.rengarajan@hp.com>,
	"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] : Spinning up disk is observed on standby paths until timeout, resulting in longer path restoration time.
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:56:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1235865381.10562.0.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090228212625.GR16891@parisc-linux.org>

On Sat, 2009-02-28 at 14:26 -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 08:52:28AM -0600, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-02-23 at 11:48 +0000, Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD) wrote:
> > > If this patch is valid , when can we expect this on mainstream
> > > kernel . I can help testing this patch when included in the kernel.
> > 
> > If you could test it and report that it works, probably fairly
> > immediately.
> 
> Narayanan reported that the patch I sent worked, but it wasn't in the push
> to Linus you just sent.  I'm not quite sure whether 'fairly immediately'
> meant 'for 2.6.29' or 'for 2.6.30', so I don't know whether this was an
> oversight or an intentional omission.  In case it was the former, I'm
> alerting you to it ;-)

It was intentional ... I've been trying to incubate rc-fixes in the next
tree for a few days (which means I can't add to the rc-fixes tree after
about Monday if I want to send it to Linus on Friday/Saturday), so it
will be in the next push.

James



      reply	other threads:[~2009-02-28 23:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-20 11:14 [PATCH 1/1] : Spinning up disk is observed on standby paths until timeout, resulting in longer path restoration time Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)
2009-02-20 15:36 ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 15:52   ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-20 16:03     ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 16:13       ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-20 16:24         ` James Bottomley
2009-02-20 17:04           ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-23 11:48             ` Rengarajan, Narayanan (STSD)
2009-02-23 14:52               ` James Bottomley
2009-02-28 21:26                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2009-02-28 23:56                   ` James Bottomley [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1235865381.10562.0.camel@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew@wil.cx \
    --cc=narayanan.rengarajan@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox