From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: Large amount of scsi-sgpool objects Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 08:12:32 +0100 Message-ID: <1236150752.6049.19.camel@marge.simson.net> References: <49ACF8FE.2020904@panasas.com> <1236093718.3263.3.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1236097526.3263.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303192212.GA20705@elte.hu> <1236115544.15993.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303214454.GA8288@elte.hu> <1236119990.24019.35.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20090303230323.GA21644@elte.hu> <49ADBE29.4040706@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <20090303234834.GA13389@elte.hu> <49AE221D.9010909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <49AE221D.9010909@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Stefan Richter Cc: Ingo Molnar , James Bottomley , Jan Engelhardt , Boaz Harrosh , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 07:39 +0100, Stefan Richter wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Stefan Richter wrote: > >> Perhaps you could avoid putting such fixes into published > >> merge branches. > [so that consumers of the trees use them only on demand] > > > > Yeah, these commits are in none of the topic branches that are > > the git base of development, they are all already in a separate > > branch named "tip:out-of-tree". > > So people should remember to retry without out-of-tree before reporting > problems == remember to report against the development base. I'll bite, how does a gut-fu white belt accomplish that? -Mike